The lord of the rings: The return of the king

[Morph]

Went to see this film last night, and what can I say, except wow! It really is an excellent conclusion to the trilogy, with just a few gripes. The way they cut out Saruman's scene was just a travesty! To me it was an integral part of the film that needed to be shown, and I was pretty dissapointed that they cut it out. Also, the ending was a little to drawn out. It wouldn't have been so bad if they didn't keep fading to black, trying to make you think that the film was over. But, overall a thoroughly enjoyable film! 5/5

[Anti-Flag]

And Grima Wormtongue wasnt it

And to anyone who never took the time to read the books... heres the all important ending... they destroy the ring... :o who saw that coming??? Its golum who does it tho... falls into mount doom innit...

Well... shoulda taken the time to read the books instead of jumping on the movie bandwagon! :p

I aint seen the movie yet meself... ah well

[Alice]

Originally posted by Anti-Flag

Well... shoulda taken the time to read the books instead of jumping on the movie bandwagon! :p



But the book is so long! And I've been told its really boring at the beginning.....wouldn't know as i've actually never read the book.....

[Anti-Flag]

I suppose it could be tedious for some people at the start but I mean... its such a rich story you can forgive the slow start :D

[franbeec]

all i have to say is 'boooooo' i hate those films

[screwedlilbunny]

Originally posted by franbeec
all i have to say is 'boooooo' i hate those films how can you hate them, guess you must be more of a "harry potter" fan :rolleyes: lord of the rings rules i think they should have started the films with the hobbit tho would make it a bit more easy to understand, i really wanna see this next film plus who can really complain.. orlando bloom is in it yummeh yum yum is all i can say. ive read quite a bit of the book but never really have the time to carry it on, should tho as it is a pretty amazing story.

[MikeT]

I much prefer HArry Potter (but the films are let downs to the books.)

I don't really like the lotr films...I saw the first one, but I ain;t seen the Two Towers yet, nor the last one...I really want to read the books though. And I expect I'll want to read the books before I actually get to see the film.

[Anti-Flag]

Originally posted by screwedlilbunny
i think they should have started the films with the hobbit tho would make it a bit more easy to understand

Miramax have the rights to The Hobbit movie... so I guess we'll see a Peter Jackson directed prequel at one point...

[franbeec]

well...iv only seen the 1st Lord of the rings film and that was soooo boring, i talked thru most ov it! so that kinda put me offa ll ov em

[Death Marine]

Maybe if you didnt talk you might enjoy it?

I thought all three were superb, the third being my favourite, although it did help alot having previously read the book twice :D

[franbeec]

Noooooo i talked BECAUSE i didnt enjoy it

[RoGiZ]

it was a exellent film 10/10
i think theghosts were a realy good part of film

if u aint seen the film u must
SEE IT

[Neo]

I saw it when it came out it was VERY VERY good except for all the people tlking and i give it a hmmm 20/10 ;)

[screwedlilbunny]

was good but if i remember rightly i was dying for a pee by the end of it.

[The Mullet of G]

yup I'm with the "I loved it crowd" got the normal editions of all 3 of them and the extended editions of the first 2, can't really call myself a real fan though as I've never paid a penny for any of them still loved them though :D

[Anti-Flag]

Could have been better in my opinion... and lets be honest here... my opinion is really the only one that counts :D